Website Stats · Original research
Pond & Water Features Website Statistics 2026
We ran automated homepage audits on 5 UK pond & water features websites — checking page speed, mobile UX, on-page SEO, structured data, contact conversion and more. Here's what we found.
Avg score
54/100
Avg page speed
198ms
Sites analysed
5
Score distribution
Good (80–100)0 sites (0%)
Okay (60–79)3 sites (60%)
Poor (0–59)2 sites (40%)
How many pass the basics
HTTPS enabled100%
Mobile viewport80%
Structured data (schema)80%
Contact form on homepage20%
Open Graph share image60%
Analytics installed60%
Most common mistakes
- No contact form found on homepage80% of sites
- No theme-color meta — plain browser chrome on mobile80% of sites
- No cookie consent banner detected — UK GDPR risk60% of sites
- No meta description — Google writes its own40% of sites
- No HN heading40% of sites
- No Open Graph image — links look blank on WhatsApp/Facebook40% of sites
- No analytics detected — flying blind on visitor data40% of sites
- No custom web fonts — default system fonts feel dated40% of sites
- No external CSS stylesheet — likely unstyled or WYSIWYG outp40% of sites
- Very few images — sparse, low-effort visuals40% of sites
How does your site compare?
Get a free audit and see where you sit versus the pond & water features average.
Methodology: automated homepage audits by RIOT London, July 2026.
