Website Stats · Original research
Mole Catchers Website Statistics 2026
We ran automated homepage audits on 5 UK mole catchers websites — checking page speed, mobile UX, on-page SEO, structured data, contact conversion and more. Here's what we found.
Avg score
30/100
Avg page speed
234ms
Sites analysed
5
Score distribution
Good (80–100)0 sites (0%)
Okay (60–79)1 sites (20%)
Poor (0–59)4 sites (80%)
How many pass the basics
HTTPS enabled100%
Mobile viewport60%
Structured data (schema)20%
Contact form on homepage20%
Open Graph share image40%
Analytics installed40%
Most common mistakes
- No theme-color meta — plain browser chrome on mobile100% of sites
- Very few images — sparse, low-effort visuals100% of sites
- No contact form found on homepage80% of sites
- No HN heading80% of sites
- No structured data (schema.org)80% of sites
- No custom web fonts — default system fonts feel dated80% of sites
- No meta description — Google writes its own60% of sites
- No Open Graph image — links look blank on WhatsApp/Facebook60% of sites
- No analytics detected — flying blind on visitor data60% of sites
- No external CSS stylesheet — likely unstyled or WYSIWYG outp60% of sites
How does your site compare?
Get a free audit and see where you sit versus the mole catchers average.
Methodology: automated homepage audits by RIOT London, July 2026.
